<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>QED Radiation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com</link>
	<description>Just another Science Blog Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cosmic Dust and the 2010 Lindau Nobel Meeting on Elementary Particles in Cosmology</title>
		<link>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33153/cosmic-dust-and-the-2010-lindau-nobel-meeting-on-elementary-particles-in-cosmology/</link>
		<comments>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33153/cosmic-dust-and-the-2010-lindau-nobel-meeting-on-elementary-particles-in-cosmology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Large Hadron Collider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmic dust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindau Meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redshift]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/?p=33153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Background The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is of interest to astronomers because elementary particles are thought related to Big Bang cosmology through dark matter and energy in an expanding Universe. Indeed, the recent Lindau Meeting discussed the topic &#8220;Dark Matter, &#8230; <a href="http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33153/cosmic-dust-and-the-2010-lindau-nobel-meeting-on-elementary-particles-in-cosmology/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33153/cosmic-dust-and-the-2010-lindau-nobel-meeting-on-elementary-particles-in-cosmology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High thermal conductivity of amorphous silicon &#8211; a quantum mechanics size effect?</title>
		<link>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33149/high-thermal-conductivity-of-amorphous-silicon-a-quantum-mechanics-size-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33149/high-thermal-conductivity-of-amorphous-silicon-a-quantum-mechanics-size-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thin Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phonons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum mechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal conductivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermoreflectance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/?p=33149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Higher conductivity of amorphous silicon (a-Si) found in 80 micron samples compared to submicron samples thought to be depend on the mean free path of phonons is negated by the size effect of quantum mechanics Background Thermoreflectance (TDTR) measurements at &#8230; <a href="http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33149/high-thermal-conductivity-of-amorphous-silicon-a-quantum-mechanics-size-effect/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33149/high-thermal-conductivity-of-amorphous-silicon-a-quantum-mechanics-size-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cancer is caused by disorganization of epithelial tissue and not by DNA mutations</title>
		<link>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33143/cancer-is-caused-by-disorganization-of-epithelial-tissue-and-not-by-dna-mutations/</link>
		<comments>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33143/cancer-is-caused-by-disorganization-of-epithelial-tissue-and-not-by-dna-mutations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basement membrane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disorganization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMP-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum mechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rac1b]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/?p=33143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mutations in the genomes of the tumor cell long thought to cause cancer is negated by QED induced ionizing radiation produced   as the MMP-3 enzyme disorganizes the basement membrane of epithelial tissues Background Epithelial tissue forming the outer layers of &#8230; <a href="http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33143/cancer-is-caused-by-disorganization-of-epithelial-tissue-and-not-by-dna-mutations/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33143/cancer-is-caused-by-disorganization-of-epithelial-tissue-and-not-by-dna-mutations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The toxicity of colloidal silver and risk of cancer</title>
		<link>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33139/the-toxicity-of-colloidal-silver-and-risk-of-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33139/the-toxicity-of-colloidal-silver-and-risk-of-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colloidal silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum mechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/?p=33139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Background Scientific American in 2008 published an article entitled: Do Nanoparticles in Food Pose a Health Risk? The article reports the widespread use of nanoparticles (NPs) in food or food-related products that do not bear the warning that they may &#8230; <a href="http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33139/the-toxicity-of-colloidal-silver-and-risk-of-cancer/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33139/the-toxicity-of-colloidal-silver-and-risk-of-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thermophones Produce Sound Without Vibration</title>
		<link>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33137/thermophones-produce-sound-without-vibration/</link>
		<comments>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33137/thermophones-produce-sound-without-vibration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thermophones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quatum mechanics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/?p=33137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Background In 1914, Lord Rayleigh communicated the description of the thermophone by de Lange to the Royal Society. But as early as 1880, Preece produced sound by passing current through micron sized platinum wires affixed to a diaphragm. Around 1800, &#8230; <a href="http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33137/thermophones-produce-sound-without-vibration/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33137/thermophones-produce-sound-without-vibration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Materials At The Nanoscale Have Zero Specific Heat</title>
		<link>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/13/materials-at-the-nanoscale-have-zero-specific-heat/</link>
		<comments>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/13/materials-at-the-nanoscale-have-zero-specific-heat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Specific Heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extensive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intensive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum mechanics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Background Specific heat is thought to be an intensive thermophysical property independent of the amount of the substance. Given the amount of the substance in a body is proportional to its volume, specific heat should therefore be independent of whether &#8230; <a href="http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/13/materials-at-the-nanoscale-have-zero-specific-heat/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/13/materials-at-the-nanoscale-have-zero-specific-heat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redshift by Cosmic Dust trumps Hubble and Tired Light Theories</title>
		<link>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/11/redshift-by-cosmic-dust-trumps-hubble-and-tired-light-theories/</link>
		<comments>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/11/redshift-by-cosmic-dust-trumps-hubble-and-tired-light-theories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Light Curves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tired Light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tolman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zwicky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hubble and Tired Light Theories In 1929, Hubble formulated a law that the velocity of a receding galaxy is proportional to its distance to the Earth. The Hubble relation held in all directions suggesting to de Sitter that the Universe &#8230; <a href="http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/11/redshift-by-cosmic-dust-trumps-hubble-and-tired-light-theories/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/11/redshift-by-cosmic-dust-trumps-hubble-and-tired-light-theories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redshift in cosmic dust resolves the galaxy rotation problem without dark matter and MOND</title>
		<link>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/9/redshift-cosmic-dust-resolves-galaxy-rotation-problem-without-dark-matter-and-mond-3/</link>
		<comments>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/9/redshift-cosmic-dust-resolves-galaxy-rotation-problem-without-dark-matter-and-mond-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmic dust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tully-Fisher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Background  The Tully-Fisher relation based on Newtonian mechanics requires the rotation velocity of spiral galaxies to vary inversely with the square root of the distance from the galactic center. See http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Tully-Fisher_relation  However, observations of galaxy rotation velocities obtained with the &#8230; <a href="http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/9/redshift-cosmic-dust-resolves-galaxy-rotation-problem-without-dark-matter-and-mond-3/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/9/redshift-cosmic-dust-resolves-galaxy-rotation-problem-without-dark-matter-and-mond-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olbers paradox is explained by cosmic dust instead of the Big Bang</title>
		<link>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33156/olbers-paradox-explained-cosmic-dust-instead-big-bang/</link>
		<comments>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33156/olbers-paradox-explained-cosmic-dust-instead-big-bang/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Bang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olbers paradox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redshift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Static Universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Doppler redshift in light from distant galaxies in a finite and expanding Universe long thought to explain Olbers paradox of why the night sky is dark and not bright is negated by cosmic dust in an infinite and non-expanding Universe  <a href="http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33156/olbers-paradox-explained-cosmic-dust-instead-big-bang/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33156/olbers-paradox-explained-cosmic-dust-instead-big-bang/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mystery of Lightning in the Iceland volcano solved by Nanoparticles?</title>
		<link>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33123/mystery-of-lightning-in-the-iceland-volcano-solved-by-nanoparticles/</link>
		<comments>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33123/mystery-of-lightning-in-the-iceland-volcano-solved-by-nanoparticles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[volcanoes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volcano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33123/mystery-of-lightning-in-the-iceland-volcano-solved-by-nanoparticles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charge produced at the instant nanoparticles form upon rubbing of ash particle surfaces may solve the long-standing mystery of how lightning in volcanoes is electrified. Background The lightning observed in the plume of the Iceland volcano has renewed interest not &#8230; <a href="http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33123/mystery-of-lightning-in-the-iceland-volcano-solved-by-nanoparticles/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://qedradiation.scienceblog.com/33123/mystery-of-lightning-in-the-iceland-volcano-solved-by-nanoparticles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

